The full write-up of the Ballymun experiment, (see 2016-5 and 2016-3), is in the Irish Journal of Social, Economic and Environmental Sustainability, IJSEES, 2017, Vol 1, № 1. (See also 2012-7 and 2011-5/6.)
Under majority rule, if there's a win for populism - Trump, Le Pen, whoever - then democracy will have failed. The need for a more consensual polity could not be greater! Hence this press release, next this letter in The Guardian, 11th Nov, and then these analyses of the US election and Trump, what a silly, dangerous nonsense and if only there had been at least some PR.
Brexit. The argument now is not 'remain' v 'leave', but another dichotomy - (of course) - 'soft' v 'hard'. These two adjectives also described the split in the All Russian Congress of Social Democrat, in London in 1903. They voted, binary - (again of course, just like us). The 'hard' wing won, by 19 to 17, with 3 abstentions. (So no side had 50%.) Nevertheless, Lenin called his side the majority, bolshinstvo, and its members the Bolsheviks. And the losers, the minority, menshinstvo, were the Mensheviks. Will history repeat itself? Will the brexiteers now split?