<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:51:58 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>DeBorda Institute</title><link>http://www.deborda.org/home/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:07:25 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-GB</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>QBS</title><dc:creator>Deborda</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:05:25 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.deborda.org/home/2010/7/28/qbs.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">220414:2176167:8384591</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><em><span style="color: navy;" lang="EN-GB">Proportionality without Transference: the merits of the Quota Borda System (QBS)</span></em><span style="color: navy;" lang="EN-GB">&nbsp; is in the latest copy of <em>Representation</em>, Vol 46 No 2, July 2010:&nbsp;</span><span style="color: navy;"><a title="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2010.485820 blocked::http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2010.485820" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2010.485820"><span style="color: navy;" title="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2010.485820">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2010.485820</span></a></span></p>
<p><span style="color: navy;" lang="EN-GB">&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.deborda.org/home/rss-comments-entry-8384591.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Coalition government</title><dc:creator>Deborda</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 19:24:19 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.deborda.org/home/2010/5/13/coalition-government.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">220414:2176167:7664891</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Exciting times, and the Guardian published <a href="http://www.deborda.org/storage/Guardian letter.doc">this letter</a> on 11th May.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.deborda.org/home/rss-comments-entry-7664891.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Scottish referendum</title><dc:creator>Deborda</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:37:50 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.deborda.org/home/2010/2/27/scottish-referendum.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">220414:2176167:6852163</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The de Borda submission is <a href="http://www.deborda.org/storage/Scotland Submission.doc">here</a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.deborda.org/home/rss-comments-entry-6852163.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Designing an All-Inclusive Democracy</title><dc:creator>Deborda</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:21:57 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.deborda.org/home/2010/2/20/designing-an-all-inclusive-democracy.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">220414:2176167:6768284</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><em>Designing an All-Inclusive Democracy</em>, ed. Peter Emerson, Springer, 2007.</p>
<p>Don Saari has written a review for Social Choice and Welfare: it is on</p>
<p><a href="http://springerlink.metapress.com/content/0530263282623016/fulltext.pdf">http://springerlink.metapress.com/content/0530263282623016/fulltext.pdf</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.deborda.org/home/rss-comments-entry-6768284.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Party Politics in the Western Balkans</title><dc:creator>Deborda</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:26:51 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.deborda.org/home/2010/2/19/party-politics-in-the-western-balkans.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">220414:2176167:6756995</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The above book, jointly edited by&nbsp;Věra Stojarov&aacute; and Peter Emerson, is published by Routledge.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.deborda.org/home/rss-comments-entry-6756995.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Decision-making on the web</title><dc:creator>Deborda</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:23:17 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.deborda.org/home/2010/2/19/decision-making-on-the-web.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">220414:2176167:6756969</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Our latest work, the result of an experiment on decision-making conducted entirely - both debate and vote - on the web, is published by EPS.&nbsp; More details on</p>
<p><a title="http://www.palgrave-journals.com/eps/journal/v9/n1/abs/eps200940a.html" href="http://www.palgrave-journals.com/eps/journal/v9/n1/abs/eps200940a.html">http://www.palgrave-journals.com/eps/journal/v9/n1/abs/eps200940a.html</a></p>
<p>A synopsis of the trial is on <a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/deborda/results">the following openDemocracy webpage</a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.deborda.org/home/rss-comments-entry-6756969.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The GOAT is a GNU. An experiment in electing an all-party coalition.</title><dc:creator>Deborda</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 14:36:28 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.deborda.org/home/2009/9/6/the-goat-is-a-gnu-an-experiment-in-electing-an-all-party-coa.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">220414:2176167:5098407</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>On 7.10.2009, the de Borda Institute hosted an open public meeting in Dublin, to see if the Dail could elect a power-sharing cabinet, with TDs choosing not only those who would serve in government, but also the particular department in which each successful Minister would serve.&nbsp; The original <a href="http://www.deborda.org/storage/MATRIX VOTE invitation 4.doc"><em>invitation</em></a> is here.</p>
<p>Participants were split into various groups, one each to represent FF, FG, Labour, Independents, GP and SF.&nbsp; And each group was given a fixed number of ballot papers, in proportion to current party strengths in the Dail: 20, 14, 5, 2, 2 and 1 respectively, a total of 44 ballots.&nbsp; The matrix vote is based on QBS and the MBC.&nbsp; So it was to everyone's advantage to submit a full ballot - i.e., to cast all their preferences - and to do so on a cross-party basis.&nbsp; Thus, in the simulation, groups planned strategies amongst themselves, and then negotiated deals with others.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The outcome was as follows: FF 6, FG 5, Lab 2, Ind 0, GP 1, SF 1 - a proportional, all-party, power-sharing coalition cabinet, a GNU.&nbsp; In other words, the matrix vote is indeed a robust voting procedure, and it all works without any resort to party labels.&nbsp;&nbsp;A full <a href="http://www.deborda.org/storage/MATRIX VOTE report.doc"><em>report</em></a> along with the <a href="http://www.deborda.org/storage/MATRIX VOTE results.doc"><em>results</em></a> are here.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.deborda.org/home/rss-comments-entry-5098407.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Open letter to Michael Wills MP, Minister of State, Ministry of Juctice</title><dc:creator>Deborda</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:03:15 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.deborda.org/home/2009/6/23/open-letter-to-michael-wills-mp-minister-of-state-ministry-o.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">220414:2176167:4412928</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of the expenses scandal, many are the calls for reform of the system of governance: <em>inter</em> <em>alia</em>, there are campaigns for changes to the electoral system and reform in the House, but few if any are suggesting reform of our decision-making processes, the 2,500-year-old majority vote, the most inaccurate measure of collective opionion ever invented.&nbsp; Hence this <a href="http://www.deborda.org/storage/Wills.doc">open letter to the Minister</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.deborda.org/home/rss-comments-entry-4412928.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Government of National Unity</title><dc:creator>Deborda</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:46:51 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.deborda.org/home/2009/4/30/government-of-national-unity.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">220414:2176167:3848872</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The peole elect the parliament, by PR; and the parliament elects the government, by PR.&nbsp; Otherwise you get those crazy consequences of majoritarianism: the US Republicans hoping that Obama will fail; the UK Labour Party producing a budget of debt deisgned for only one year.&nbsp;</p>
<p>In Ireland, too, the need for parliamentary collective responibility is obvious.&nbsp; Hence this letter in <em><a href="http://www.deborda.org/storage/GNU.doc">The Irish Times</a></em>, published on Wed. 22nd April.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.deborda.org/home/rss-comments-entry-3848872.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Election of Green Party Cathaoirleach - an analysis of the MBC</title><dc:creator>Deborda</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:22:37 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.deborda.org/home/2009/4/30/election-of-green-party-cathaoirleach-an-analysis-of-the-mbc.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">220414:2176167:3848644</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Irish Political Studies has just published an interesting analysis of the Modified Borda Count (or preferendum) vote, which was used in the 2007 election by the Irish Green Party/<em>Comhaontas Glas</em> when they elected their <em>Cathaoirleach</em>/chairperson.&nbsp; It was written by John Baker of Equality Studies in UCD, and <a href="http://www.deborda.org/storage/Baker 2008 Election of Green Party Cathaoirleach.pdf"><em>here it is</em></a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.deborda.org/home/rss-comments-entry-3848644.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>