About us

A blog: I'm going to China. Starting in Vienna with a TEDx talk, I then head to Belgrade, Sarajevo, Tbilisi, Baku and Kabul, before catching a bus across Tajikistan to Kashgar, 喀什, in Xīnjiāng, 新疆, where I hope to buy a bicycle.  https://debordaabroad.wordpress.com/2017/09/07/de-borda-abroad/

 

38 DEGREES   -   PETITION

Mulit-option and Preferential Referendums

Please sign the petition on

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/multi-option-and-preferential-referendums/manage

_/-_/-_/-_/-_/-_/-_/-_/-

DECISION-MAKER
Inclusive voting app 

www.decision-maker.org

  JUST OUT  -  THE APP TO BEAT ALL APPS, ABSOLUTELY!

_/-_/-_/-_/-_/-_/-_/-_/-

The Hospital for Incurable Protestants

The Mémoire of a Collapsed Catholic

 This is the story of a pacifist in a conflict zone, in Northern Ireland and the Balkans.  Only in e-format, but only £5.15.  Available from Amazon.

 

_/-_/-_/-_/-_/-_/-_/-


About us

Visit us on Facebook

The de Borda Institute aims to promote the use of inclusive voting procedures on all contentious questions of social choice.

This applies specifically to decision-making, be it for the electorate in regional/national polls, for their elected representatives in councils and parliaments, for members of a local community group, for members of a company board, for members of a co-operative, and so on.

 

 

 

The director alongside the statue of Jean-Charles de Borda, capitaine et savant, in l’École Navale in Brest, 24.9.2010. Photo by Gwenaelle Bichelot. 

Search
Login
Powered by Squarespace
Won by One
WELCOME

Welcome to the home page of the de Borda Institute, a Northern Ireland-based international organisation (an NGO) which aims to promote the use of inclusive voting procedures on all contentious questions of social choice. For more information use the menu options above or feel free to contact the organisation's headquarters. If you want to check the meaning of any of the terms used, then by all means have a look at this glossary.

As shown in these attachments, there are many decision-making and even more electoral systems.  Sometimes, for any one voters' profile - that is, the set of all their preferences - the outcome of any count may well depend on the voting procedure used.  In this very simple example of a few voters voting on just four options, and in these two hypothetical examples on five, (word document) or (power-point) in which a few cast their preferences on five options, the profiles are analysed according to different methodologies, and the winner could be any one of all the options.  Yet all of these methodologies are called democratic!  Extraordinary!

deborda.gif

What's New?

Saturday
Dec102016

2016-16 Let the Dáil Elect the Government. 

 

The full report of the Ballymun experiment, (see 2016-5 and 2016-3), is on page 56 of the Irish Journal of Social, Economic and Environmental Sustainability, IJSEES, 2017, Vol 1,  1.  (See also 2012-7 and 2011-5/6.)

 

Tuesday
Nov292016

2016-15 Italy & USA, bad voting systems

As in brexit, the Italian referendum asks the wrong question. Hence this press release.  Meanwhile, openDemocracy has published this on majoritarianism and its consequence: Trump.

 

 

Thursday
Nov172016

2016-14 Ireland, the 8th amendment

This is our submission to the Citizens' Assembly

Sunday
Nov132016

2016-13 Canada

Canada is reviewing its electoral system, so hopefully they will use multi-option voting and include QBS.  And then maybe the US will follow suit?  See 2016-12.

Friday
Nov112016

2016-12 Brexit and Trump

Under majority rule, a win for populism  -  Trump, Le Pen, whoever  -  means democracy has failed.  The need for a more consensual polity could not be greater!  Hence this press release, next this letter in The Guardian, 11th Nov, and then these analyses of the US election and Trump, what a silly, dangerous nonsense and if only there had been at least some PR.  (See also 2016-9.)

Brexit. The argument now is not 'remain' v 'leave', but another dichotomy - (of course) - 'soft' v 'hard'. These two adjectives also described the split in the All Russian Congress of Social Democrat, in London in 1903. They voted, binary - (again of course, just like us). The 'hard' wing won, by 19 to 17, with 3 abstentions. (So no side had 50%.) Nevertheless, Lenin called his side the majority, bolshinstvo, and its members the Bolsheviks. And the losers, the minority, menshinstvo, were the Mensheviks. Will history repeat itself? Will the brexiteers now split?