About us

Inclusive voting app 



The Hospital for Incurable Protestants

The Mémoire of a Collapsed Catholic

 This is the story of a pacifist in a conflict zone, in Northern Ireland and the Balkans.  Only in e-format, but only £5.15.  Available from Amazon.


About us

Visit us on Facebook

The de Borda Institute aims to promote the use of inclusive voting procedures on all contentious questions of social choice.

This applies specifically to decision-making, be it for the electorate in regional/national polls, for their elected representatives in councils and parliaments, for members of a local community group, for members of a company board, for members of a co-operative, and so on.




The director alongside the statue of Jean-Charles de Borda, capitaine et savant, in l’École Navale in Brest, 24.9.2010. Photo by Gwenaelle Bichelot. 

Powered by Squarespace
Annual Reports
Won by One

Welcome to the home page of the de Borda Institute, a Northern Ireland-based international organisation (an NGO) which aims to promote the use of inclusive voting procedures on all contentious questions of social choice. For more information use the menu options above or feel free to contact the organisation's headquarters. If you want to check the meaning of any of the terms used, then by all means have a look at this glossary.

As shown in these attachments, there are many decision-making and even more electoral systems.  Sometimes, for any one voters' profile - that is, the set of all their preferences - the outcome of any count may well depend on the voting procedure used.  In this very simple example of a few voters voting on just four options, and in these two hypothetical examples on five, (word document) or (power-point) in which a few cast their preferences on five options, the profiles are analysed according to different methodologies, and the winner could be any one of all the options.  Yet all of these methodologies are called democratic!  Extraordinary!


What's New?


2016-9 David Cameron, the 3 'whiches'.

EU - wrong question gets wrong answer.  There's a letter in The Guardian (7th Oct), and this critique of brexit, David Cameron and the three 'whiches' which was published in Brussels and London.


The UK referendum was bound to be 'Leave', as predicted in this press release of 5.2.2016, and this article of November, 2015.  So hence https://www.opendemocracy.net, this letter in the local press, a further letter from Phil Kearney to the Dublin press (but unpublished), and a posting on Slugger O'Toole. See also 2016-6.


2016-8. NI - dodgy elections

A prediction:  PR-STV counts are sometimes askew: in Newsletter of May 4th, suggested the count could be odd.


And sure enough, it was.  So hence this correspondence today.


2016-7. BBC, Radio 4, at last!

John Humphrys, on Today, 2nd May. (Scottish) referendums: "the realm of the absurd."  So will the BBC, at last, talk about multi-option voting?


2016-6. Scotland. The question was a fix!

Scottish Affairs has just published this review of Scotland's 2014 referendum.  See also 2016-11, 2014-12, 2013-15, 2012-13/10/1, 2011-1.


2016-5. Ireland: Let the Dáil elect a Govt.

Perfect timing again.  The outcome of the Irish Times/DCU/deBorda/CiviQ matrix vote experiment on 23rd April, could hardly have been better: the result was proportional, most of the ministers were appointed to departments for which they were appropriate and, if it had been for real, it would have been the most gender-balanced Dáil ever!  So the Irish Times published this opinion piece on 22nd  -  http://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/opinion-there-is-a-better-way-to-form-a-government-than-50-days-of-chaos-1.2619525  -  and this report of the event on 25th:  See also 2016-3.