About Me

Aims of the Institute

The de Borda Institute aims to promote the use of inclusive voting procedures on all contentious questions of social choice.

This applies specifically to decision-making, be it for the electorate in regional/national polls, for their elected representatives in councils and parliaments, for members of a local community group, for members of a company board, for members of a co-operative, and so on. The appropriate methodology is the Borda count or rather, its modernised form, the Modified Borda Count (MBC) or "Borda preferendum"; (it is also known as consensus voting). 

pemerson@deborda.org

Search
Login
Powered by Squarespace

FAQ on Inclusive Voting Procedures > What is a Preferendum? > What’s wrong with majority rule?

Search the FAQ for entries containing:

Not much. It is certainly much better than any form of minority rule, especially a dictatorship.

The thing that is wrong, however, is this: a majority opinion cannot be identified by a majority vote. It sounds paradoxical, but is nevertheless true. In many instances, a majority votes identifies, not the will of the people, and not even the will of the majority of the people, but only the will of he who wrote the question.

Which perhaps explains why the majority vote was used by such notables as Napoleon, Lenin, Mussolini, Stalin, Hitler, Duvalier, Pinochet, Mugabe, and Saddam Hussein. It has also been used by others far less malign, by politicians who like to control.

Last updated on September 19, 2008 by Deborda