About Me

Aims of the Institute

The de Borda Institute aims to promote the use of inclusive voting procedures on all contentious questions of social choice.

This applies specifically to decision-making, be it for the electorate in regional/national polls, for their elected representatives in councils and parliaments, for members of a local community group, for members of a company board, for members of a co-operative, and so on. The appropriate methodology is the Borda count or rather, its modernised form, the Modified Borda Count (MBC) or "Borda preferendum"; (it is also known as consensus voting). 

pemerson@deborda.org

Search
Login
Powered by Squarespace

FAQ on Inclusive Voting Procedures > What is a Preferendum? > The ‘tyranny of the majority’ presupposes that the majority is always wrong. Is it?

Search the FAQ for entries containing:

No. In some instances, the consensus view will be the same as a majority view. Indeed, when there is unanimity, the consensus view will be the same as any minority view as well.

If you take a majority vote when there is a plurality of options, you might get a majority in favour of quite a few of them. Right kids, the teacher might say, what shall we do today? Go swimming? Hurrah. Watch a movie? Hurrah. A consensus voie would clarify the situation to find out which option was the most popular.

There again, you might get a situation when there isn’t a majority in favour of anything. This happened in Westminster in 2003 when they debated reform of the House of Lords: they had five options on the table, they took five majority votes, and they lost the lot! It was a decision-making process by which, for those people with those opinions, they could not make a decision!

Slovenia did the same in a multi-option referendum: three options on the ballot paper, and all three of them were lost.

In both scenarios, a consensus vote would have identified the best possible compromise.

Last updated on September 19, 2008 by Deborda