About us

About us

Please see here for some background on the director.  And this is a Youtube presentation by Phil Kearney on decision-making.

The de Borda Institute aims to promote the use of inclusive voting procedures on all contentious questions of social choice.

This applies specifically to decision-making, be it for the electorate in regional/national polls, for their elected representatives in councils and parliaments, for members of a local community group, for members of a company board, for members of a co-operative, and so on.

pemerson@deborda.org

Personal site

 

The director alongside the statue of Jean-Charles de Borda, capitaine et savant, in l’École Navale in Brest, 24.9.2010. Photo by Gwenaelle Bichelot. 

Search
Login
Powered by Squarespace

FAQ on Inclusive Voting Procedures > What is a Preferendum? > Is the preferendum suitable for all decision-making situations?

Search the FAQ for entries containing:

No. If the subject matter is non-contentious, then by all means use a majority vote. On controversial topics, however, and especially on those occasions when someone(s) object(s) to the use of a majority vote, then it is better to use a preferendum.

What’s more, some questions are two-optional, and on such occasions a for-or-against majority vote is indeed ok . In politics, as in life itself, however, most questions are actually multi-optional – if, that is, the question is asked correctly! “Capital punishment, yes-or-no?” is the wrong question; the better way is to ask, “How shall we deal with the convicted murderer?”

In general, then, the only questions which are definitely yes-or-no apply to situations when a country is joining an existing organisation, as when Bulgaria, for example, joins the eu .

Interestingly enough, the only country ever to hold a referendum on what might appear to be a two-option question – “Which side of the road shall we drive on?” – actually had three options on the ballot paper. Sweden, 1955.

Last updated on September 19, 2008 by Deborda