About Me

Aims of the Institute

The de Borda Institute aims to promote the use of inclusive voting procedures on all contentious questions of social choice.

This applies specifically to decision-making, be it for the electorate in regional/national polls, for their elected representatives in councils and parliaments, for members of a local community group, for members of a company board, for members of a co-operative, and so on. The appropriate methodology is the Borda count or rather, its modernised form, the Modified Borda Count (MBC) or "Borda preferendum"; (it is also known as consensus voting). 

pemerson@deborda.org

Search
Login
Powered by Squarespace

FAQ on Inclusive Voting Procedures > What is a Preferendum? > Is the preferendum suitable for all decision-making situations?

Search the FAQ for entries containing:

No. If the subject matter is non-contentious, then by all means use a majority vote. On controversial topics, however, and especially on those occasions when someone(s) object(s) to the use of a majority vote, then it is better to use a preferendum.

What’s more, some questions are two-optional, and on such occasions a for-or-against majority vote is indeed ok . In politics, as in life itself, however, most questions are actually multi-optional – if, that is, the question is asked correctly! “Capital punishment, yes-or-no?” is the wrong question; the better way is to ask, “How shall we deal with the convicted murderer?”

In general, then, the only questions which are definitely yes-or-no apply to situations when a country is joining an existing organisation, as when Bulgaria, for example, joins the eu .

Interestingly enough, the only country ever to hold a referendum on what might appear to be a two-option question – “Which side of the road shall we drive on?” – actually had three options on the ballot paper. Sweden, 1955.

Last updated on September 19, 2008 by Deborda